“Black Lives Matter” is movement that started in the wake of
the Trayvon Martin trial and acquittal of his killer, George Zimmerman. The movement gained momentum after the police
shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. There have been over 600 “Black Lives Matter”
demonstrations worldwide and the protest organizers and protestors have met
with President Obama, Vice President Biden, and Attorney General Holder to
demand that the federal government do something about the fact that, “[b]lack communities
have suffered under racially biased policing and unconstitutional law
enforcement policies for far too long.” Have the black communities suffered? In
some ways, it depends on perspective.
However, the facts allude to a different story altogether.
The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports database provides a wealth
of statistics on crime in the nation.
According to the FBI, in 2012, 123 blacks were shot and killed by police
versus 326 whites killed by police.
However, the data doesn’t provide much information on whether the person
was armed, unarmed, retreating, fighting with officers, etc., so it’s difficult
to tell if the policing is racially biased or not. But as I researched, I came across other
facts that tell a different story.
In 2012, there were more than 8.3 million arrests in the
United States. Blacks accounted for 28 %
of those arrests, while 69 % of those arrested were white (Note: The FBI data
includes Hispanics as part of the white population). The US Census bureau reports that blacks make
up 13% of the US population, so one could say that there is a disproportionate
number of arrests, but is that due to racial profiling or is the fact of the
matter that blacks commit a larger portion of crimes?
When broken down by offense, 49% of those arrested for
murder and 51% of those arrested for robbery were black. Again, one could argue that this is
indicative of widespread bias. I think
not. Buried in the data are these two
facts. From 2003 to 2012, blacks were
responsible for 44 % of the deaths of officers killed in the line of duty. But more disturbingly, 91 % of the 2648
blacks murdered in 2012 were killed by blacks.
It seems to me that black-on-black crime is a much more serious problem
than white on black (193 blacks murdered by whites in 2012) or police killing
blacks. So why don’t we hear more
protests about black-on-black crime?
The professional rabble-rousers like Al Sharpton, Jesse
Jackson, and the like don’t want to talk about the real issues because they get
no mileage out of it. Which is more sensational
and more likely to grab headlines, an innocent teen killed by a racist
neighborhood watch volunteer or another story about blacks killing blacks? Obviously, they can’t get attention if they
can’t grab headlines so they focus on the sensational, ignoring the real issue
and try to make the rest of us feel guilty about race. And the problem of black-on-black crime
continues. Sounds like hypocrisy to me.
Do blacks have a legitimate concern about unfair and biased
policing? I’ll concede that it is not only possible, but likely. Is it due to racism or stereotyping? It’s hard to say. But FBI data indicates that the bulk of the
violent crimes happen in urban areas populated primarily by blacks. And FBI data indicates that the majority of law
enforcement patrols are deployed to these same areas. For the many law-abiding blacks living in
these communities, the police are their only protection; the police patrols
exist because black lives do matter.
Black lives do matter; all lives matter. But the next time
you hear one of these protestors say that black lives matter, ask yourself if
they mean all black lives, or only the lives that give them 15 minutes of media
time.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Polite, rational, and thoughtful discourse is encouraged. Comments that are rude, vulgar, or off topic will be deleted.